<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
		<rss version="2.0">
		  <channel>
				<title><![CDATA[The Indiana Law Journal &amp; The Indiana Law Journal Supplement - Articles - ]]></title>
				<link>http://www.indianalawjournal.org</link>
				<description />
				<language>en-us</language>
				<copyright><![CDATA[http://www.indianalawjournal.org]]></copyright>
				<generator>N/A</generator>
				<webMaster>admin@indianalawjournal.org</webMaster>
				<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:47:40 EST</lastBuildDate>
			
				<ttl>20</ttl>

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Children as Witnesses: A Symposium on Child Competence and the Accused’s Right to Confront Child Witnesses]]></title>
					  <link>http://www.indianalawjournal.org/articles/33/1/Children-as-Witnesses-A-Symposium-on-Child-Competence-and-the-Accusedas-Right-to-Confront-Child-Witnesses/Page1.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<span>Although problems concerning witnesses are
always interesting and important&#8212;raising issues of competence, hearsay,
impeachment, and expertise&#8212;such issues become even more difficult in criminal
cases, where we must incorporate the accused's Sixth Amendment right to
confrontation. As applied to children, with their still-developing cognitive
abilities, immaturity, susceptibility to influence, and need for protection,
such questions about witnesses are particularly acute.<br/><br/><span>The scholars in this symposium address these
questions from different angles, bringing to bear history, psychology, and a
careful analysis of the recent Supreme Court cases on confrontation. They
address five important themes: (1) the special status and rights of children as
witnesses; (2) ways in which the special case of child witnesses illuminates
contradictions, ambiguities, unresolved questions, and the unfortunate tendency
towards all-or-nothing thinking in recent Supreme Court Sixth Amendment
jurisprudence; (3) practical suggestions for balancing the interests of child witnesses
and the rights of the accused in criminal cases; (4) an inquiry into the fate
of pre-<i>Crawford</i> cases, most
importantly <i>Maryland v. Craig</i>; and (5) a critique of the uses and
abuses of historical research by the Supreme Court in its attempt to address
issues of confrontation.<br/><br/></span><span>The papers in this symposium were originally
prepared for the Section on Evidence of the 2007 Annual Meeting of the
Association of American Law Schools.</span><br/> </span> ]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Aviva A. Orenstein)</author>
					  <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:44:42 EDT</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.indianalawjournal.org/articles/33/1/Children-as-Witnesses-A-Symposium-on-Child-Competence-and-the-Accusedas-Right-to-Confront-Child-Witnesses/Page1.html</guid>
					</item>

				
				  </channel>
				</rss>
			