<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
		<rss version="2.0">
		  <channel>
				<title><![CDATA[The Indiana Law Journal &amp; The Indiana Law Journal Supplement - Articles - ]]></title>
				<link>http://www.indianalawjournal.org</link>
				<description />
				<language>en-us</language>
				<copyright><![CDATA[http://www.indianalawjournal.org]]></copyright>
				<generator>N/A</generator>
				<webMaster>admin@indianalawjournal.org</webMaster>
				<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:55:45 EST</lastBuildDate>
			
				<ttl>20</ttl>

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Kids Say the Darnedest Things: The Prosecutorial Use of Hearsay Statements by Children]]></title>
					  <link>http://www.indianalawjournal.org/articles/35/1/Kids-Say-the-Darnedest-Things-The-Prosecutorial-Use-of-Hearsay-Statements-by-Children/Page1.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<span>In <i>Kids
Say the Darnedest Things: The Prosecutorial Use of Hearsay Statements by
Children</i>, Lininger distills and addresses three vital issues: (1) how
courts can define whether statements by children are testimonial, (2) what
accommodations could make the experience of being a child witness less
traumatic, and (3) how forfeiture should be defined in the context of children.</span>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Tom Lininger)</author>
					  <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:56:37 EDT</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.indianalawjournal.org/articles/35/1/Kids-Say-the-Darnedest-Things-The-Prosecutorial-Use-of-Hearsay-Statements-by-Children/Page1.html</guid>
					</item>

				
				  </channel>
				</rss>
			