<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
		<rss version="2.0">
		  <channel>
				<title><![CDATA[The Indiana Law Journal &amp; The Indiana Law Journal Supplement - Articles - ]]></title>
				<link>http://www.indianalawjournal.org</link>
				<description />
				<language>en-us</language>
				<copyright><![CDATA[http://www.indianalawjournal.org]]></copyright>
				<generator>N/A</generator>
				<webMaster>admin@indianalawjournal.org</webMaster>
				<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:11:51 EST</lastBuildDate>
			
				<ttl>20</ttl>

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[The History of Children’s Hearsay: From Old Bailey to Post-Davis]]></title>
					  <link>http://www.indianalawjournal.org/articles/37/1/The-History-of-Childrenas-Hearsay-From-Old-Bailey-to-Post-Davis/Page1.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[<span>Focusing on a specific period in English
history, Professor Thomas Lyon and Raymond Lamagna analyze in detail the
historical record of the hearsay use of child witness statements in rape cases
heard in the Old Bailey from 1684 to 1789. Their purpose is to illuminate and
provide context for <i>The King v. Brasier</i>,
a case cited by <i>Davis v. Washington</i>,
a confrontation case decided a year after <i>Crawford.
Davis </i>cited <i>Brasier</i> as historical
support for the proposition that a hearsay declarant's statements made after
the emergency has passed are inadmissible. The Supreme Court used <i>Brasier</i> to shore up the distinction
between nontestimonial requests for help that need not be subject to
cross-examination, and post-incident testimonial statements that trigger the
right of confrontation.</span> ]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Thomas D. Lyon &amp; Raymond LaMagna)</author>
					  <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:16:18 EDT</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.indianalawjournal.org/articles/37/1/The-History-of-Childrenas-Hearsay-From-Old-Bailey-to-Post-Davis/Page1.html</guid>
					</item>

				
				  </channel>
				</rss>
			