<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
		<rss version="2.0">
		  <channel>
				<title><![CDATA[The Indiana Law Journal &amp; The Indiana Law Journal Supplement - Articles - ]]></title>
				<link>http://www.indianalawjournal.org</link>
				<description />
				<language>en-us</language>
				<copyright><![CDATA[http://www.indianalawjournal.org]]></copyright>
				<generator>N/A</generator>
				<webMaster>admin@indianalawjournal.org</webMaster>
				<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:30:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>
			
				<ttl>20</ttl>

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Misplaced Angst: Another Look at Consent-Search Jurisprudence]]></title>
					  <link>http://www.indianalawjournal.org/articles/4/1/Misplaced-Angst-Another-Look-at-Consent-Search-Jurisprudence/Page1.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[

<p><span>In examinging Fourth Amendment searches and seizures,
this Article makes a distinction between the concepts of "consent"
and "voluntariness." The former need not entail the latter, suggests
the piece, since "consent" is nothing more than a label placed on a
given police/suspect interaction in order to legitimate that interaction.
Professor Williams, an accomplished attorney whose clients include Mumia Abu-Jamal,
wrote this piece specifically for the <i>Indiana
Law Journal</i>, in response to Professor Ric Simmons's article </span><span><i><span>Not
"Voluntary" But Still Reasonable: A New Paradigm for Understanding the Consent
Search Doctrine, </span></i></span><span><span>published in Voume 80 of the </span></span><i><span>Journal</span></i><span>. </span></p>

]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Daniel R. Williams)</author>
					  <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:20:03 EDT</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.indianalawjournal.org/articles/4/1/Misplaced-Angst-Another-Look-at-Consent-Search-Jurisprudence/Page1.html</guid>
					</item>

				
				  </channel>
				</rss>
			